If you just got down to the funky fresh rhythms of Edwin
Starr’s “War,” you must have noticed the predominant anti-war message it sends.
Similarly, David Dudley uses the magical powers of song to get the attention of
his audience. While their messages differ entirely, Starr and Dudley’s
approaches combine the growing music industry of the 1960’s, with the emerging
civil rights movement, in order for them each to become major influences at the time. The tempo of Starr’s
song however, is very up beat and catchy, while Dudley’s has a much slower
tempo and a more serious tone. These varying tones and tempos mimic the
attitudes of the hippy, pot smoking, and (most importantly) young anti-war
movement, with the up tight, conservative, and older pro-war movement. The way
each of these songs is performed reveals the two very distinct cultures that
emerged in the 1960’s and the reasons for such aggressive protests.
Also if you
haven’t seen the 1 minute and 30 second clip of Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker
singing "War" that the directors of Rush Hour threw into the movie to make the
audience forget just how bad of an actor Jackie Chan is, here is the scene.
-Sam Jacobson
Sam, great post, and I really like the way you're playing around with style here. What was happening in Rush Hour at this point? Is it relevant or really just a distraction?
ReplyDelete